• Home
  • Research
    • Identities in Action
    • Doing Good
    • Publications
  • People
  • Resources
    • For Change Agents
    • For Students
    • COVID19
    • PEPSS
    • Leapfrog
    • Forward
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  Social Change Lab
  • Home
  • Research
    • Identities in Action
    • Doing Good
    • Publications
  • People
  • Resources
    • For Change Agents
    • For Students
    • COVID19
    • PEPSS
    • Leapfrog
    • Forward
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy

Why “I don’t see race or skin colour” is an unhelpful anti-racism strategy

30/4/2018

5 Comments

 
Picture M&Ms separated by colour
Is it really possible to not see race or colour when we meet someone? Image: Flickr Lu Yu (CC BY 2.0)
When I had first moved to Australia from India, a friend of mine was growing out his hair and we were having an elaborate discussion about how his hair could be styled. He was looking for some advice from me (I give great hair and skincare advice in general). I suggested a look and he wasn’t convinced at first. So I said to him that I’d google it for him and show him how it could look on someone like him. When I typed the style descriptor in, I added “White male” into the search terms. He found it hilarious and said that just adding “male” would have done the job. He later joked that I was being super racist towards him! I had to explain to him that while in his world, “man” just meant men who looked like him (i.e., White), my world consisted of both White men and other men of colour. In describing him as a White man, I was being specific and descriptive.
 
Our relationship with race continues to be a difficult one - true for both White folks and for folks of colour.

Consider this: white folks apparently shouldn’t be seeing colour in anything or anyone – things get pretty awkward the moment race or skin colour is mentioned. Additionally, folks of colour can’t catch a break from “where are you really from?” based on how they look.  They are encouraged to become race-blind by the very same people when they’re told “Oh my god, stop seeing race in everything!”. It’s only time before someone gets badly hurt from all this blindness!
 
The topic of race makes people anxious, and it doesn’t help that talking about race also evokes social disapproval. To protect ourselves from all this angst, we use different strategies such as avoidance, pluralistic ignorance, and denial. One particularly preferred strategy, is called strategic colourblindness.
 
Strategic colourblindness is the avoidance of putting race on the table.  It is the avoidance of talking about race, noting racial factors as influencing anything, or even acknowledging racial difference. The purpose of this is to avoid the appearance of bias, or avoiding potential misunderstanding, or the avoidance of discomfort that comes from considering the issue of race.
 
It’s the familiar “I don’t see race or skin colour, I see people as people” line. It sounds great, right? It may even seem like a strategy that would make the world an equal place for us all. But as research now shows (see here for a review), it is a strategy and set of beliefs that is linked with several social processes that  preserve the racial status quo, and further entrench existing cleavages in inter-racial interactions.
 
So how is it harmful to suggest that we see people as individuals and not as mere members of groups? Let’s break it down from the start.
 
“I don’t see colour” – is it really possible for us to not perceive race when we meet someone?
 
People claim that they don’t see race or skin colour, but on the contrary, research indicates that people are not colourblind perceivers. Of all the dimensions on which people categorise others, race is among the quickest and most automatic categories we process when we see someone.
 
People see colour, but saying that they do, is not socially acceptable. This gap between perceiving racial categories and the reduced social acknowledgement of it, is often guided by social and interactional motivations.  This means that people don’t acknowledge race because they don’t want to appear prejudice, and want to avoid the anxiety of race-based conversations.
 
Is insisting on a colourblind view of the world actually furthering racial hierarchy, alienating White folks, and silencing racial minorities?


1. Colourblind strategies make White people feel bias-free but they ironically appear biased to folks of colour: 

 Research shows that whilst avoiding the issue of race is a way of protecting oneself from the anxiety inter-racial interactions for socially dominant groups, most commonly White folks in the inter-racial equation, it actually backfires and is counterproductive.  Contrary to seeming non-prejudicial and bias-free, when White people avoid race in race-relevant contexts, folks of colour are quick to pick up on the avoidance, and perceive them as racially biased.

2. The “I don’t see colour” line, may feel like equality, but the consequences associated with such beliefs are far from equal.

Colourblind beliefs are associated with implicit bias, modern racism, and less support for equality initiatives that create opportunities for minorities.

3. Colourblind beliefs makes us particularly prone to ignoring, overlooking, or downplaying instances of inequality and bias.


Ignoring people’s identity groups makes us prone to either ignoring or downplaying instances of bias, discrimination, or inequality (see here and here). So when White folks adopt colourblindness, it can make them blind to the injustices that folks of colour face as a result of the racial groups they belong to, and the unique experiences they come with.  Also, colourblind views are seen as maintaining the status quo – keeping the system of racial hierarchy and oppression-justifying beliefs going.  System-justifying beliefs can include beliefs that racism is now a thing of the past, and that inequality by race or ethnic group no longer exists.  Put together, it keeps the cycle of poor faith and mistrust going between White people and racial minorities.
 

I’m going to end by going back to the question I asked at the start: 
How does something that is actually suggesting that we see people as individuals and not as mere members of groups, harmful?
 

Try to answer the following questions for yourself now that you have read the research.
When I adopt a colourblind strategy:
  1. Whose feelings am I protecting – mine or the other person’s?
  2. How does the other person want to be seen – as just an individual, or as a whole person made up of both their individual experiences and their unique racial/ethnic experiences?  
 
 
Tulsi Achia is a second year PhD student in the social change lab, and works as a researcher for a not-for-profit organisation. Her PhD focuses on advantaged group allyship or solidarity with disadvantaged groups and ways in which it goes wrong. In projects outside her PhD,  she is currently exploring the framing of group-blind thinking in the context of expressed progressive values and allyship with disadvantaged groups, and its impact on the uptake or rejection of diversity initiatives. 

5 Comments
David Hamilton
2/3/2019 12:49:37 am

Thank you Tulsi this was interesting to read. Sadly I disagree strongly and feel we need to be braver in being an inclusive society here and in the wider world. We need to avoid judging/separating/differentiating with skin colours we all have a different colour so to speak. One should instead engage and be inquisitive carefully to find out what everyone’s background/heritage is. It helps to understand each other in this crazy modern world we live in? Our make up and dna is unique to each of us and our families. I for example consider myself a British mongrel with some Jewish roots. The ‘where are you really from’ question is wrongly angled but this does not mean the question should not be asked in a different more appropriate way. Maybe I’m incorrect but I strongly believe there should be no fear in sharing where you came from in an educated world. We are all human beings sharing this admittedly increasing unequal planet. Good luck with the studies.

Reply
Tulsi Achia
7/3/2019 10:26:27 am

Hi David, thank you for reading the blog and sharing your reflections on the theme. We love it that members of the public are engaging with the research behind common social observations.

I like the phrase you use: "we need to be braver in being an inclusive society". It reminds me of this viral TED talk that was given by this corporate head, Melody Hobson, about being exactly that; being "colour brave" rather than being colour-blind in how we understand and relate to people from diverse backgrounds. In case you haven't watched it, I'm leaving the link here. You might enjoy this talk: https://www.ted.com/talks/mellody_hobson_color_blind_or_color_brave

The research on colour-blind beliefs shows that it is indeed a complex phenomenon: people are found to strategically employ colour-blind beliefs. Sometimes espousing such beliefs out of good intentions and the need to create a more egalitarian society, and at other times, expressing such beliefs out of avoidance so that they don't have to engage with experiences of inequality and focus instead on a happier, positive state - everyone being equal or the same. We are yet to understand what outcomes may be associated with these varying motivations. Thanks again for your comments!

- Tulsi Achia

Reply
Susan
6/1/2021 05:12:39 am

David, you talk a lot about the way things "should" be, which is part of having aspirations -- great. And, one can also be brave in dealing with the way things actually are in reality, which is that many people have to deal with racism, both physical violence and repeated exclusionary behavior. Some people who advocate as you do for colorblind ideology want people to act as if the "should be" situation actually existed rather than the practicalities of their lived experience. This is ideological rather than practical and white privilege entices some people to assume that their own situation is shared by others. They are blind to racism, too.

Reply
Susan
6/1/2021 05:17:04 am

This is a well-written article that covers a lot of ground that many white people would benefit from contemplating. As a person of color who grew up in a white neighborhood and experienced a lot of racism as well as seeing my parents subjected to racist and disrespectful behavior as well as understanding the historical racist experiences of my community -- I've grappled with trying to understand the consistent denial by so many white people of racism, both interpersonal and systemic, that is right in front of them.
Thank you for this article with its useful and interesting citations of studies providing the basis for your conclusions.

Reply
Tulsi Achia
6/1/2021 09:48:41 am

Hi Susan, thank you so much for your comments. We love to see people engaging with our blogs. I am so sorry to hear about your experiences of racism. Glad to hear that this work resonated with you. Part of why we write these blogs, is to not just publicly disseminate research findings on important social issues in lay language, but to also empower people with evidence on these issues.

Best,

Tulsi Achia

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed


    Authors

    All researchers in the Social Change Lab contribute to the "Do Good" blog. Click the author's name at the bottom of any post to learn more about their research or get in touch.

    Categories

    All
    Activism
    Communication
    Community Action
    Discrimination
    Education
    Environment
    Gender
    Helping
    Identities
    Legend
    Norms
    Politics
    Race
    Relationships
    Research
    Romance
    Trajectories Of Radicalisation And De Radicalisation
    Trajectories Of Radicalisation And De-radicalisation

    Archive

    December 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017

Location

Social Change Lab
School of Psychology
McElwain Building
​The University of Queensland
St Lucia, QLD 4072
Australia

    Join our mailing list

Subscribe

Picture
Follow us on Twitter!
Check out our Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2017
  • Home
  • Research
    • Identities in Action
    • Doing Good
    • Publications
  • People
  • Resources
    • For Change Agents
    • For Students
    • COVID19
    • PEPSS
    • Leapfrog
    • Forward
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy